We can now prove that where you are is not what they have a lien on
Posted by: “Kingsman Funding” kngsfund@gmail.com kngsfund
Date: Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:13 pm ((PDT))
This below is not all that needs to be said but it is the essence of why you can make this statement. This can be modified ofcourse for tax lien issues, code enforecment and property tax issues from the bank lien format below:
As affirmed by Affidavit FI WMF, herein attached, this loan contract was not a common law contract between real natural persons or real commercial entities including the Affiant, who had believed himself to be a party to the contract, a sovereign flesh and blood natural man but, who was construed by his signing of the contract, undisclosed to him, to be acting as fiduciary agent for the non-real artificial juristic entity, person or vessel of legal fiction of his name in ALL CAPITAL letters identified in the contract as the actual borrower and legal party to the contract rather than himself, the sovereign flesh and blood man, nor was it a contract pertaining to title to property of real earth and soil on the land, to be governed under the civil common law over the land, on New York, the state of the Republic;
[[ Again, Affiant has affirmed by Affidavit FI WMF at the time this contract was signed by him he did not know and it was not disclosed to him for his agreement to it that, ]]
[[Affiant has affirmed by Affidavit FI WMF at the time this contract was signed by him he did not know and it was not disclosed to him for his agreement that, ]]
By its terms, stylings, spellings, abbreviations, symbols and/or delineations of the names of the entities, locations and properties identified, the loan contract in dispute was to be construed as between artificial corporate persons, juristic entities and/or vessels of legal fiction and pertaining to title of artificial juristic locations and entities of legal fiction, to allow for and facilitate commerce involving such legal fictions subject in commerce under the International Law Merchant and maritime law of corporate and/or administrative jurisdictions over such federally enfranchised corporate persons and vessels of legal fiction and artificial juristic locations and entities of legal fiction within federal areas, regions, zones, districts and jurisdictions of the federal United States, the federal UNITED STATES, INC., its federal area or jurisdiction, STATE OF NEW YORK; or “federal district of the District of Columbia”, STATE OF NEW YORK; and was not to be construed as governed within the jurisdiction of the civil common law over the land, on New York, the state of the Republic, United States of America, preserving to the borrower under the contract Affiant’s constitutional and unalienable rights under that civil common law over the land, on New York, the state of the Republic, and over its citizens thereon. Nor was he aware that the protections of his constitutional and unalienable rights under these civil common law jurisdictions that adhere to him as a sovereign born state citizen domiciled on the land under these constitutions was not to be afforded the Affiant, J. Bruce Weatherly, the flesh and blood man and/or the legal borrower and maker of the contract under it.
[ Such that ] The legal description as to what title was granted to the borrower in his warranty deed for his purchase under the contract of sale and the legal description of title as to what has been pledged as security in the deed of trust granted by the borrower to [name of original lender] in the loan contract is not a legal description identifying the property of real earth and soil on the land, I am domiciled on, on Dallas County, New York, the state of the Republic I came into possession of from the loan contract in dispute.
This is evidenced by the following:
First, Abbreviations, and symbols used referencing monetary amounts of the loan and payments to be made indicate it is was not expected to be paid in money of substance of gold and silver or negotiable instruments drawn on the same as is required under the civil common law in contracts between real sovereign flesh and blood natural persons and real commercial entities to extinguish the debt.
Second, stylings, spellings, abbreviations, symbols and Zip Codes authorized by the United States Postal Service are repeatedly used to identify and locate artificial corporate juristic locations, entities, persons and vessels of legal fiction who are the parties, participants and subject property of the contract, which spellings, abbreviations, symbols and codes are not mandatory pursuant to Domestic Mail Service Regulations, Section 122.32, and the Postal Reorganization Act, Section 403 (Public Law 91-375) but are mandated and only applicable in Federal territories and enclaves located within the 50 States of the Union,. the federal United States and its territories and the District of Columbia and its statutory and regulatory extensions into the constitutional states of the republic, which have been delineated as “States” of the [federal] United States ” cf. Piqua Bank v. Knoup, 6 Ohio 342, 404 (1856) and U.S. v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1, 63 (1936, and other artificial, fictional regions, zones, districts and federal areas of jurisdiction created and existing only in law by map and/or description for their respective administrative governmental purposes, not intending to delineate real actual territorial land masses of and on states of the constitutional republic of original jurisdiction on the land, such as pursuant to the Social Security Board in 1935 creating Social Security “Districts, the adoption by the Internal Revenue Service of the ZIP Code areas as “Revenue Districts”, ( the Federal Register, Volume 51, Number 53, Wednesday March 19, 1986) , and the Buck Act in 1940 authorizing in Sections 105-113 the creation by any department of the federal government, “Federal Areas” of corporate, administrative or territorial jurisdiction within the boundaries of the several states for imposition of certain laws and by definition is “attached to anyone who has a Social Security number or any personal contact with the federal or State government.”
And as further may be shown, in Sec. 110(d) of the Buck Act: The term “State” includes any territory or possession of the United States; and in 15 USC § 4723a (k) (2) the term “State” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, or any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States; as well as under the Provisions of 4 USC 105, the federal “State” is (also known as, “The State of.……..”) and as may be seen in numerous other federal law, Congress defines various places of exclusive federal jurisdiction as “States” as distinct from “states of the Union”;
The Supreme Court further has determined, “There has been created a fictional federal “State (of) xxxxxx within a state.” See Howard v. Sinking Fund of Louisville, 344 U.S. 624, 73 S.Ct. 465, 476, 97 L.Ed. 617 (1953); Schwarts v. O’Hara TP School District, 100 A 2d. 621, 625, 375, Pa. 440.
31 C.F.R. Parts 51.2 and 52.2 also identify a fictional State within a state, by the use of the two-letter abbreviations for the names of real actual land masses of the states of the republic like “PA”, “NJ”, “AZ”, and “DE”, etc., and their ZIP Codes, which fictional States are within the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of Congress over federal possessions, properties, territories and the District of Columbia and its statutory and regulatory extensions into the constitutional states of the republic by way of the corporate, commercial, military, admiralty or maritime jurisdictions over federally enfranchised citizenship, upholding the debt of the federal UNITED STATES, INC. originating from a private, commercial, military, admiralty or maritime international law de facto Jurisdiction as government under the federal emergency War Powers since 1861, 12 Stat 319, which has never been repealed and exists in Title 50 USC §§ 212, 213, 215. and 12 USC 95a, b. resulting in “Federal Areas”; fictional admiralty (military) jurisdictions of the same names as the states of the republic. Each being a corporation, chartered in a private, military, international, commercial, admiralty/maritime jurisdiction, entitled “STATE OF…” e.g. “STATE OF NEW YORK,” as evidenced by, inter alia, changes in the seal of the state, the creation of new constitutions, and/or numerous other evidences from examination of documents in the office of the state archivist, all functioning as administrative government for artificial juristic federal citizens and properties of legal fiction within the physical boundaries of the real territorial land masses of the states of the republic, as corporate, commercial, fictional, federal, administrative, ministerial divisions of the same name of the de jure states of the republic; the federal area of the same name and spelling [STATE OF NEW YORK ] under the federal corporation UNITED STATES INC. that created them, which, as noted above, exist only in law by map and/or description for their respective administrative governmental purposes and are not a state of the constitutional republic, the United States of America or any division thereof of original jurisdiction on the land, on that state of the republic, as such artificial, fictional federal areas, regions, zones and districts and divisions as derivatives there from are exampled above.
Such that these stylings, spellings, abbreviations, symbols and Codes of the United States Postal Service, as noted above, are intended and mandated only to apply to the exclusive legislative jurisdictions of Congress over the federal United States and its federal possessions, properties and territories and corporate, commercial fictional, administrative or ministerial divisions of federal areas, regions, zones, and districts of the artificial, juristic, colorable, legal fiction entities of international maritime jurisdictions of the federal United States, the federal UNITED STATES, INC., its federal area or jurisdiction, STATE OF NEW YORK; and/or the “federal district of the District of Columbia”, STATE OF NEW YORK.
And under law and administrative regulation referenced herein, the deliberate use by the lending bank’s authors of the loan documents of such terms, abbreviations, symbols and zip codes to identify and distinguish the parties, entities, locations and properties referenced in the subject contract in dispute are prima facie evidence such terms therein have been used there to locate and identify only artificial juristic locations, entities, persons, vessels and property of legal fiction as subjects of this contract, created and existing only in law and by map and/or description, as noted above, for commerce between legal fictions and administrative governmental purposes under the International Law Merchant and maritime law within federal areas, regions, zones, districts and jurisdictions of the federal United States, the federal UNITED STATES, INC., its federal area or jurisdiction, STATE OF NEW YORK; or “federal district of the District of Columbia”, STATE OF NEW YORK, which are not common law jurisdictions over real natural persons and sovereign state citizens on the land, as Affiant has affirmed he is, and over real commercial entities or property of real earth and soil on the land as Affiant has affirmed he came into possession of from the loan contract in dispute, and is domiciled on, (see Affidavit exhibit DC, herein attached ) and is further prima facie evidence the lending bank’s authors of the contract were not intending by the use of such delineations of the parties, entities, locations and properties that are the subjects of the contract in dispute to identify and locate any real, natural person, vessel or property of real earth and soil on the land or real commercial entities as a party or subject of this contract and not the actual property of soil on the land, I am domiciled on, and came into possession of from the loan contract in dispute; being property of soil on the land, on Dallas County, New York, the state of the Republic.
Thirdly, the legal description as to what title was granted to the borrower in his warranty deed for his purchase under the contract of sale and the legal description of title as to what has been pledged as security in the deed of trust granted by the borrower to [name of original lender] in the loan contract does not describe what may be determined by original land survey as being any portion of the 160 acres of actual property of real earth and soil on the land on common law land patent XXXXXX granted by the constitutional republic, united Stated of America on [June 10, 1862 ], (see exhibit LP herein attached),
[[ but [[ Which property of soil on the land Affiant came into possession of from the loan contract in dispute, upon best belief and knowledge, may be determined by such original land survey as being a portion of that 160 acres of real earth and soil on the land on common law land patent XXXXXX granted by the constitutional republic, united Stated of America on [June 10, 1862 ] as found within the physical and real territorial boundaries of the common law [ Territory of / XXXXXXX/ the New York Bay Company/ state of the Republic, New York, directly created through the Sovereign electors on New York,] known by this original jurisdiction on the land in which it was ceded as being property of real earth and soil on the land of the physical, territorial and geographical land masse [ known to have become] [which is] New York, the state of the Republic and [is now/became ] property of soil on the land, near 152 Aron Street of the Pontotoc community , on Dallas County, New York, the state of the Republic; [[ possessed by the Affiant from the loan contract in dispute]], of which property of soil Affiant has no knowledge any Secretary of State of New York has ever declared to have been ceded to the federal United States, the federal Corporation UNITED STATES, . or its federal area or jurisdiction, STATE OF NEW YORK, or the “federal district of the District of Columbia”, STATE OF NEW YORK. ]]
[[as determined by survey of [name of company ], certification no. xxxxxxxx, and which property of real earth and soil on the land [[ possessed by the Affiant from the loan contract in dispute]] is therein determined as being a portion of the 160 acres of real earth and soil on the land on common law land patent XXXXXX granted by the constitutional republic, united Stated of America on [June 10, 1862 ] as found within the physical and real territorial boundaries of the common law [ Territory of / XXXXXXX/ the New York Bay Company/ state of the Republic, New York, directly created through the Sovereign electors on New York,] known by this original jurisdiction on the land in which it was ceded as being property of real earth and soil on the land of the physical, territorial and geographical land masse [ known to have become] [which is] New York, the state of the Republic, ( see exhibit S herein attached), and [is now/became ] property of soil on the land, near 152 Aron Street of the Pontotoc community , on Dallas County, New York, the state of the Republic, of which property of soil Affiant has no knowledge any Secretary of State of New York has ever declared to have been ceded to the federal United States, the federal Corporation UNITED STATES, . or its federal area or jurisdiction, STATE OF NEW YORK, or the “federal district of the District of Columbia”, STATE OF NEW YORK. ]]
[[ And to which property of real earth and soil on the land [[ I came into possession of from this loan contract in dispute, and]] [ am domiciled on], as herein above identified and referenced, Affiant has now effectuated legal allodial claim of title by right of possession (see exhibit RP herein attached). And to which claim Afiant affirms all parties that might assert an equitable interest in this portion of the 160 acres of real earth and soil on the land on land patent XXXXXX as a common law grant of the constitutional republic, united Stated of America on Dallas County, New York, state of the Republic, as described and referenced above, have been notified, having had 60 days to challenge said claim to allodial title in a court of law, (see exhibit N, attached), and having failed or been unable to do so, upon best belief and knowledge of the Affiant, this above described property of soil on the land on Dallas County, New York, state of the Republic, has become the property and allodial freehold of the Affiant. And by such claim Affiant does here affirm he brings said property of soil on the land out of Equity status together with all rights, privileges, immunities, and appurtenances of whatsoever nature thereunto belonging.]]
Ideally I think because so many people have a home in a planned subdivision their legal description says; “Lot X of XYZ subdivision” and to be done properly, you need to find the common law legal description.
All land is surveyed in every state from some central point. In Utah, it is called the Salt Lake Base and Meridian. The Meridian is a vertical line and the Base is a horizontal line that intersect some where, in the case of Utah, it is in downtown Sale Lake City. In every state it is the same and this is common law. Then from the base and meridian are Ranges, Townships, and Sections. There are 36 Sections to a Township, and 640 acres to a Section which is 1 square mile, and the whole state will be laid out this way. Therefore a meets and bounds legal description will say something like;
“Range 23 West of the Salt Lake Base and Meridian, township 42, section 26, from the southwest corner marker of the Southwest quarter the north property line goes 350 feet due west and thence 500 feet due south, and from thence 350 feet due east, and from thence 500 feet due north to the southwest corner of the southwest corner marker”
If your legal description now says Lot 23 of the Rancho Grande Subdivision, it is in a corporation and you need it to say something like what is above if you want to prove a difference in what you are on from the what you conveyed to the mortgage company.
Ideally, you will need to get a surveyor to come out and survey your property giving the specific location of your property in terms of meets, bounds, degrees, minutes and seconds and other surveying technical terms.
and have him make his legal description in relation to these otherdescriptions of the state, county and the original land patent which we know were actually meant to describe property of real earth and soil on the land.
Or at least have him take your oldest description of your specific property in meets and bounds etc. and have him make a legal description of what you are on in relation to these other descriptions of the state, county and the original land patent.
I am sure there will be discussion or even controversey. I hate this but I guess it is necessary to deal with it. I am at 662-489-6554, Dr. Weatherly
You may reach us at 662-489-6554.
On another very important subject let me add something.
Most people don’t understand this, but God was in Christ paying for all our sins on the cross and its over and done and finished and He’s not angry with us about anything any more.
The Bible says, He is for us, not against us.
He died in our place to purchase us for Himself and if you’ll give in to Him, there’s nothing He won’t be able to do in your life.
I know, I have been with Him for 28 years.
And when we finally leave this world, we’ll live with Him forever, if we belong to Him.
If you need to think about that or you have someone in mind that does, I’ll be glad to talk with them.
My number again was 662-489-6554.
I just wanted you to know that.
Dr. Weatherly